Principles of Critical Appraisal

Why Critical Appraisal?

Why indeed?

Clinical medicine is an applied science. While most of us are not trained in the rigors of doing research, we must be able to understand and apply the research of others to our work. Critical appraisal of research a little like art appreciation or literary criticism - it requires understanding some context, understanding the tools and techniques, and evaluating whether the creators got their message across correctly.

We can let others do this critical appraisal for us. The publishers of textbooks, study guides and review journals succeed based on this idea.  However, we need to know the basics of how to do it for ourselves, so that we can judge how well these other information sources critically appraise the information.

Six Basic Elements of Critical Appraisal

Assess the RESEARCH QUESTION

Why are the researchers doing this study?

identify the PICO question this study addresses - this is not always straightforward.  

HINT - look at the last sentence in the introduction/background section.

P - patients/population

I - intervention/exposure/test of interest

C - comparison/reference standard

O - outcome/diagnosis

for more help with PICO questions, see Asking Focused Questions

Assess the STUDY DESIGN

How did the researchers decide to answer their question?

Assess the VALIDITY

Can we trust the results we get to be true and unbiased about the population studied?

Assess the RESULTS

What types of outcomes were studied, were there significant findings, and how significant were they?

Assess the APPLICABILITY

Can we use this evidence to treat out patients?  Do the findings apply to our patients?

Decide on the CLINICAL BOTTOM LINE

If it's not valid, you should not use it.

It it's only applicable to some of your patients, or under select circumstances, then note this.

If you need to see other literature confirming this result before you change your practice, that's ok too.

Notes:

A quick review of basic critical appraisal terms, statistics and concepts: EBM Toolbox Glossary

We should always be able to cite the article appropriately so that we can refer to it. First author, journal, issue and page number are usually sufficient.


Additional Ways to Understand Critical Appraisal 

The EQUATOR Network catalogues guidelines written for authors and editors to ensure that all useful information is presented in a journal article.  These can be useful as checklists for critically appraising articles also.

Therapy Studies: CONSORT

Systematic Reviews: PRISMA

Cohort/Case-Control Studies: STROBE

Diagnostic Test Studies: STARD